In a Nutshell. Mini reviews of movies old and new. No fuss. No spoilers. And often no sleep.
Showing posts with label Jack Quaid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jack Quaid. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 March 2025

Novocaine (2025)


Nathan Caine is a mild-mannered bank manager with an extreme case of CIPA (Congenital Insensitivity to Pain with Anhidrosis), which basically means he feels nothing. When the girl of his dreams is taken hostage during a bank robbery, he sets out in pursuit, setting off a chain of events in motion which set the stage for plenty of violent antics at his expense. It's a fun premise that runs dry quickly and isn't quite clever enough to sustain an entire feature. There is a lot of potential to be had with a man who is impervious to pain, but the film doesn't do enough with it and leaves it all on the table. Jack Quaid brings plenty of charm to the role and makes it watchable, if not forgettable.

2½ epi-pens out of 5

Saturday, 1 February 2025

Companion (2025)


This is a very annoying movie to nut because of the prevalence of spoilers. The teaser trailer was perfect, but the official trailer gave away the biggest twist that is better off discovering on your own. So, try as I might, I found the one poster that didn't give away anything. Not that it really matters much; if you're interested in this movie at all, you probably already know the basic premise. It involves a couple heading to a weekend retreat at a remote cabin with some friends and...stuff happens. This is probably my vaguest review yet, but it's fun so long as you're kept in the dark.

3 corkscrews out of 5 (-½ for marketing)

Thursday, 31 October 2024

Scream (2022)

AKA: Scream V

As a jaded horror fan, I actually enjoyed this one quite a bit. I'm not sure if I'm letting my defenses down lately, but I don't think it was worse than any of the other sequels. The leads (especially the sisters played by Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega) were very well cast and I believed their relationship. I didn't anticipate the twists either, so it was a success in that regard.
It's not as slick and stylish as it was under the direction of Wes Craven, but it still manages to capture the ethos of the time it was made in. This volume introduces the idea of the "requel"—i.e. the reboot/sequel to a legacy series—which this film also represents (meta as always). 

3 toxic online comments out of 5